On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Page, Jeremy <jeremy.p...@gilbarco.com> wrote:
> I use micro to test chef scripts. Apache (assuming you mean httpd) works > fine as a static httpd. Or am I missing the sarcasm tag? Last I checked, micro instances weren't really provisioned for even a bare bones Apache httpd. nginx, maybe. In any case, what you and apparently others in this thread are missing: IT'S A ***MICRO*** INSTANCE. This does not mean "cheaper normal instance". It means "massively underprovisioned instance". If you are surprised that it sucks a lot, you need to think about whether you even understand what a micro instance is, and whether it is at all appropriate for your use --- not assume that AWS's definition is required to be the same as yours. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
