Greg A. Woods wrote in <m1suHsv-0036s2C@more.local>: |At Fri, 27 Sep 2024 07:14:46 +0700, Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> wrote: |Subject: Re: interactive shell detection in shrc ... |Reading POSIX Issue 7 sh(1) just now I note the following text: | | If the -i option is present, or if there are no operands and the | shell's standard input and standard error are attached to a | terminal, the shell is considered to be interactive. | |So there's nothing in POSIX about login(1) tacking a leading hyphen on |and using that to trigger the shell to become a login shell. | |Indeed from what I can tell POSIX has nothing whatsoever to say about |"login shells" nor /etc/profile or $HOME/.profile. | |I guess to be entirely POSIX compatible my test should include: | | tty >/dev/null 2>&1 && tty <&1 >/dev/null 2>&1 && | [ "$0" = "$SHELL" ] && | _interactive=true
then you have to go Simon J. Gerraty who ensured me that he always uses -t and i found out then this indeed is very old and usable. -t 0 && -t 2, thus. (I think Robert fixed the NetBSD shell to also go 0 and 2 lately.) (And, dear Robert, i am not looking at the other emails as i am afraid you have given an answer (and it surely says something like that the space is a separator put by echo); i had a thinking coming into my brain when i was doing the dishwash, last night.) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
