At Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:56:40 +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> wrote:
Subject: Re: interactive shell detection in shrc
>
> case ${-} in
> *i*|*m*) # {{{
> ...
> esac
I'm very curious: why did you include "m" in that test?
I do note the following from the bosh(1) manual:
... POSIX requires that job control is auto-enabled for
interactive shells ...
But I'm pretty sure the key word there is "interactive", which will by
definition also mean they have 'i' in $-.
For what it's worth I the original Bourne shell (as supplied in pkgsrc
shells/heirloom-sh) does not put 'i' in $- (ever).
The enhanced Bourne shells, aka the Schily Bourne Shells, shells/bosh
and shells/pbosh, similarly do not have 'i' in $- while sourcing
~/.profile, but they do adjust $- after ~/.profile has been sourced.
Since they all derive from the same parent I guess the fact they share
this quality should not be too surprising.
To work around this I do the following:
_interactive=false
case "$-" in
*i*)
_interactive=true
;;
esac
case "$0" in
-*)
_interactive=true
;;
esac
if ${_interactive}; then
: ... do interactive setup
else
: ... do script-mode setup
fi
unset _interactive
--
Greg A. Woods <gwo...@acm.org>
Kelowna, BC +1 250 762-7675 RoboHack <wo...@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <wo...@planix.com> Avoncote Farms <wo...@avoncote.ca>
pgpuBXpcPD_ft.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
