On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:33:22AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > | (what are the odds that anyone > | on a slow machine will ever look at lam(1)?) > > I must admit that I'd never looked at lam(1) - on any speed of machine. > > But when I did just now, just for the thrill of it, I see ... > [...] > The proverbial someone should fix that.
Fixed. Also if inserting newlines is an intended use case, I kinda think it ought to accept \n in there, which it currently doesn't. > just from that man page read, I suspect that perhaps that -s should > also be -S (but that's speculation). Indeed. Someone changed it a while ago without apparently having read thoroughly enough. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
