On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > I bet that cat(1) is always faster, but I consider myself as the only > regular (at all?) user of these pages at least since since 6.x and > nobody caring.
Also, if we do have a platform where it's too slow and anyone actually cares, the right answer is really not to spend a gob of disk space generating all the pages in advance (what are the odds that anyone on a slow machine will ever look at lam(1)?) but to teach man about caching. That is: I agree, fire away. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
