In article <20200528203553.gb12...@bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: >On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 06:04:23PM -0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> In article <20200527141158.ga16...@bec.de>, >> Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: >> >----- Forwarded message from Christos Zoulas <chris...@netbsd.org> ----- >> > >> >Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 15:26:41 -0400 >> >From: Christos Zoulas <chris...@netbsd.org> >> >To: source-chan...@netbsd.org >> >Subject: CVS import: src/external/mit/libuv/dist >> >Reply-To: source-change...@netbsd.org >> > >> >Module Name: src >> >Committed By: christos >> >Date: Sun May 24 19:26:41 UTC 2020 >> > >> >Update of /cvsroot/src/external/mit/libuv/dist >> >In directory ivanova.netbsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18348 >> > >> >Log Message: >> >Import libuv, needed by bind-9.16.x >> > >> >---- >> > >> >Why was this import not discussed before it happened? I remember quite a >> >few concerns about the long term state of BIND and whether it wouldn't >> >be better to drop it (potentially in favor of Unbound), so it seems >> >somewhat rude to just import another not so small and redundant library >> >without any discussion. >> >> My fault. I did discuss it on icb and with core and people felt it was >> easier to add libuv and keep bind. We can remove both of them in the >> future. > >Well, even if it is a short-gap measure, can we at least stop installing >it and link it internally into BIND? Others have mentioned it, but it is >quite likely to create a lot of headache otherise.
Ok, I will make it link internally and not install it. christos
