In article <20200527141158.ga16...@bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: >----- Forwarded message from Christos Zoulas <chris...@netbsd.org> ----- > >Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 15:26:41 -0400 >From: Christos Zoulas <chris...@netbsd.org> >To: source-chan...@netbsd.org >Subject: CVS import: src/external/mit/libuv/dist >Reply-To: source-change...@netbsd.org > >Module Name: src >Committed By: christos >Date: Sun May 24 19:26:41 UTC 2020 > >Update of /cvsroot/src/external/mit/libuv/dist >In directory ivanova.netbsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18348 > >Log Message: >Import libuv, needed by bind-9.16.x > >---- > >Why was this import not discussed before it happened? I remember quite a >few concerns about the long term state of BIND and whether it wouldn't >be better to drop it (potentially in favor of Unbound), so it seems >somewhat rude to just import another not so small and redundant library >without any discussion.
My fault. I did discuss it on icb and with core and people felt it was easier to add libuv and keep bind. We can remove both of them in the future. christos
