On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:55:05PM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > <co...@sdf.org> wrote: > > > If anything we should get rid of perfuse. > > FUSE has thee API: kernel level, low level and high level. > > refuse only implements the high level API > > perfuse implements the kernel API, libfuse runs on top of it and > provides low level API and high level API. ` > > Hence, perfuse supports all FUSE filesystems, while refuse can only > supports the one that use the high level API. > > If you want to dive into more details, here is my EuroBSDcon 2014 paper > on that stuff: http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz/fuse.pdf > > > -- > Emmanuel Dreyfus > http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz > m...@netbsd.org
I'm just going to commit code without code review if all the responses are going to be "please don't work on X, work on Y instead". I am interested in librefuse because that's what gets used.
