On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:51:01AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:36:03PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > > One assumes that a (much smaller) staticly linked /bin/sh would be > > slightly faster still - but doing that isn't really what I think we > > should be doing (that option is open to anyone who wants it by > > just building a static root filesys) as it loses the ability to > > get libc bug fixes by just updating libc.so, and also would consume > > a little more overall ram as the libc in sh wouldn't be shared > > with anything else. > > More importantly, static /bin/sh breaks both LD_PRELOAD and NSS.
And UTF-8.
