On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:14:47PM +0000, m...@netbsd.org wrote: > Relax, the end conclusion was not to delete it. To maintain it until a > replacement comes in. Please help test the replacement if it is written, > to ensure it works for your case.
- Given an exploit, it's still going to be an uninteresting. It's passive and will work for a very small population. We are in a world where Equifax had a vulnerable Apache Struts instance for several months (they are not alone). - Let's all get together some time, it's hard to offset negative interaction by text. - We still care about people who run on weak hardware - Yes I know that telnet is useful for testing remote servers - There was a precedence by OS X, we aren't doing this though. - PuTTY is nice - dh is somewhat frustrated and doesn't have enough energy, this is contagious and makes you want to quit everything. - This deletionist attitude is frustrating if it touches things you care/d about. - Not deleting telnet client w/o replacement satisfying everyone.
