On 12/02/2016 12:35, Robert Swindells wrote: > Ryota Ozaki wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Mouse <mo...@rodents-montreal.org> wrote: >>>> [J]ust wondering if we are going to see vether(4) anytime soon. >>> >>> How would this vether differ from the existing tap? Presumably I'm >>> just missing something.... >> >> dhcpcd didn't work well with bridge(4) and tap(4) didn't help that. >> vether(4) would help that. We may be able to address the issue by >> fixing bridge or tap but I have no idea for now. > > I have a theory for why this happens. > > I have a local change to bridge(4) in my tree that explicitly adds the > MAC address for each member interface rather than adding it lazily the > first time it is seen in a packet.
Does it handle the MAC address changing on a member interface? Roy