> [J]ust wondering if we are going to see vether(4) anytime soon. How would this vether differ from the existing tap? Presumably I'm just missing something....
> This would simplify the administration and possibly the code of > bridge(4) in that bridge(4) would become strictly transit and not > have to worry about acting as both transit and endpoint. I don't see why bridge has to act as endpoint even now. (I suspect this is due to whatever I'm missing that leads to my first question, above....) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
