On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:16:52AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:13:03AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> > Just curious: clang comes with a static analyzer nowadays; wouldn't
> > it be any better than the old lint, or is it missing features that
> > can't make it a decent replacement for lint?
>
> The only real feature missing from lint is the "link" support, aka
> inter-file consistency checking.
Which is really replaced by function prototypes - assuming they actually
come from a shared header file!
David
--
David Laight: da...@l8s.co.uk
