Was there any qualification on why each framework was chosen?
What I'm curious about is this: do devs use Tapestry only for their
general, simple web applications? Or, are they/we willing to use it for
deadline-oriented mission critical enterprise applications?
- Mike
Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/22/2006 10:50 AM
Please respond to
"Tapestry users" <tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org>
To
TapestryUsers <tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org>
cc
Subject
promoting Tapestry
Just want to share:
last night here at Seattle Java User group we had a round table
discussion where people were presenting WEB UI frameworks they use and
tried to highlight things they love about them. There were many:
Millstone, Barracuda, echo2, JSF, Struts, Tapestry, Tiles/Sitemesh, DWR,
RubyOnRails
Every presenter had about 6-8 minutes for a “sales pitch” and at the end
people answered the question:
If you were a king and decide what framework to use for next project,
which framework will you use? (People voted once only for just one
framework)
Tapestry – 15;
Struts – 5;
JSF – 3;
The rest got zero or 1 votes;
I could attribute Tapestry's warm reception to my presenter skills :)
but in reality it is the Howard's hard work and Tapestry community make
the framework so appealing to developers.
I ask everybody to speak about Tapestry more frequently on occasions and
this way we all will benefit from wider Tapestry adoption.
Konstantin Ignatyev
PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen
million tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of
tropical rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate between
forty to one hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil,
add 2,700 tons of CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population
by 263,000
Bowers, C.A. The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement Needs
a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools. New York: State
University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206)
