I think your question should be adjusted: Ruby on Rails vs. Tapestry
Tapestry without Java is nothing. Much like Ruby by itself is not going to help you with your web project. On 3/6/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can't really compare them. Ruby is a programming language, Tapestry is a > java web application framework. The idiosyncracies between languages alone > limit the ability to draw any useful comparisons. > > The only general argument I can think of is that "java" has a lot more > robust enterprise sort of support (ie jms/hibernate/jmx/drools/etc..). If > you're building a smaller sort of site and don't have any requirements other > than building a pure web interface then RoR might not be the worst choice ;) > > > On 3/6/06, Edward Scanzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I got the question today...What is the difference between Tapestry and > > Ruby (on Rails). I want some good reasons as to why Tapestry is a superior > > choice. Please feel free to comment. > > > > Thanks > > E > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
