I don't know why LOLs got dropped on you, but maybe this has something to do with it. Howard Ship posted this about a week ago. I'm still scratching my head over it...
"The scalability that Tapestry gets because of its rigid page and component structure is one of its clear differentiators; something I've heard that the JSF Expert Group is envious about. The structure is rigid, the behavior is highly dynamic. That's good enough for almost everyone. What I expect to do in a later release of Tapestry is change and simplify the APIs so that it doesn't even look like something you can or should do. Howard M. Lewis Ship" Raul Raja Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/28/2006 03:06 AM Please respond to "Tapestry users" <tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org> To tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject Re: tapestry not really component based? are the laughs because feature requests in Jira are ignored? Ron Piterman wrote: > lol > Ron > > > Geoff Longman wrote: >> add a feature request to jira. >> >> Geoff >> >> On 1/27/06, Raul Raja Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> It looks like the ability to dynamically add components is something >>> that a lot of people have asked for. Are there any plans to include this >>> feature in the future? >>> >>> Ivano wrote: >>> >>>> I understand the problem better now. >>>> >>>> Probably what happens is that people used to work with Java on web >>>> (with >>>> JSP, JSTL, Struts, and so on) sees tapestry as one of the first >>>> component-based approach to web development. >>>> And if you compare that with previously available java web >>>> frameworks it >>>> really is a *tremendous* improvement. >>>> People used to work with ASP have a different perspective, being >>>> able to >>>> compare that component technology with Tap, and I actually think >>>> this is >>>> good, since it could bring improvements in Tapestry development path. >>>> Summing it all up I think we all should appreciate your kind of >>>> considerations, as long as they're not only useless critics. >>>> My opinion here. >>>> >>>> Bye bye. >>>> >>>> Ivano Pagano. >>>> >>>> gaz jones wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> i just wanted to get some opinions on it really and see if others were >>>>> having the same problem etc... the problem that patrick described is >>>>> exactly >>>>> the thing that was bugging me... i wanted to add links and i had to >>>>> shoe >>>>> horn them in rather than use the predefined component and it just felt >>>>> wrong >>>>> because that is what a component based architecture is for surely! >>>>> >>>>> however there are lots of people who seem to say they just get used to >>>>> the >>>>> tapestry way of doing things... fair enough. i can accept that the >>>>> framework >>>>> doesnt work in the same way as others do, and like mike said there are >>>>> a LOT >>>>> of things to like about tapestry, and the pros definately outweigh the >>>>> cons. >>>>> >>>>> ill be interested to see how it develops in 4.1... until then i'll >>>>> just keep >>>>> posting messages about not being able to add components dynamically >>>>> every >>>>> few weeks :P >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net >> Get help with Spindle: >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user >> Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman >> Feature Updates: http://spindle.sf.net/updates >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
