I would mention - it is OK to temporarily map ones not visible on aerial images but likely to be mistakenly remapped - "can safely be removed" - would change that it not only can be removed, but also should be removed
5 gru 2022, 11:26 od [email protected]: > I have placed what I believe is a summary of this discussion on the OSM wiki > for lifecycle > > It reads > > "The following tags function is to reduce the possibility of a mapper > remapping the feature from existing satellite imagery that shows the old > state of the feature. Once the OSM available satellite imagery does not show > the feature the feature can safely be removed from OSM. Renders cannot rely > on OSM preserving physically vanished history." > > There after follow the tags 'demolished', 'removed', 'destroyed' and 'razed'. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay > > > If there are any further thoughts or even corrections to my text above then > please post them here. > > > My own thoughts? > > I have not placed any warning about mechanical edits to seek these out as > enough warning is evident in the requirement for it to be not shown in the > OSM satellite imagery, which would discourage me so I think it will work with > others. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
