On 04.10.24 23:31, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Hi Premislav,
Please do not proceed before we have clarified several points.

Why:
I live in Padova, the same Region of Italy, but a different Province.
I have inspected a small sample of your recently imported data in Borca di
Cadore.
My observations: many, but not all addresses are inside buildings, and not
on the entrance. This is contrary to what I believed was standard around
here.

I don't see any problem in that. Most addresses in my zone are nodes inside buildings and very few are entrance nodes on the building perimeter or even slightly outside. There's little damage done either way.

OTOH having a house number, even if it's not at the most precise location, is a big win for people who use car navigators: it makes them find the house.

The navigator software will project the house number onto the nearest street before routing, so it doesn't matter if the node is inside the house, or on the perimeter, or even slightly outside.


In contrast I could not find out where your data came from. It looks very
much as if some voluntary contributor has created address data for an open
access-public data base, used in Province of Belluno using OSM data as
source: We have to find out more about both aspects before proceeding.

On the site where the data comes from it says:

"Capofila del progetto è il Consorzio BIM Piave di Belluno, un’aggregazione di 60 Comuni bellunesi di cui ne supporta lo sviluppo equilibrato, erogando servizi per la gestione del processo di trasformazione digitale."



mfg

--
Marcello Perathoner
marce...@perathoner.de


_______________________________________________
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Rispondere a