Se ho capito bene la proposta, si tratta di highway=footway tunnel=building_arcade building_arcade:right=open al posto di highway=footway tunnel=yes
Mi va bene anche "covered" - non importa Volker On 19 January 2012 15:04, Paolo Monegato <gato.selvad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il 19/01/2012 14:29, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: > > C'รจ una proposta interessante in questo contesto: >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/** >> building_passage<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/building_passage> >> >> Volker >> > tunnel=building_arcade ?! > > IMHO non possono essere classificati come tunnel. > > Semmai > covered=building_passage (+ footway=yes) > covered=building_arcade (+ footway=yes) > > ciao > Paolo M > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-it mailing list > Talk-it@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-it<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it> > -- Volker SCHMIDT Via Vecchia 18/ter 35127 Padova Italy mailto:vosc...@gmail.com office phone: +39-049-829-5977 office fax +39-049-8700718 home phone: +39-049-851519 personal mobile: +39-340-1427105 skype: volker.schmidt
_______________________________________________ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it