The problem is that we frequently have cycleways or food-cycle-ways that are legally oneway for cyclists, but not for pedestrians. They are tagged "oneway=yes". I agree we need a oneway tag for pedestrians, but it cannot be a simple oneway=yes because that is already in use with a different meaning, i.e. "oneway for vehicles".
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, 08:03 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging, < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Sep 10, 2023, 23:37 by graemefi...@gmail.com: > > > On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 01:25, Niels Elgaard Larsen <elga...@agol.dk> > wrote: > > Volker Schmidt: > > Be careful: oneway=* is a legal access tag, only valid for vehicles, not > for pedestrians. > > > We do have a lot of highway=footway,oneway=yes > > > Also know of suspended Tree Walk walkways e.g. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-28.23281/153.13822 which are > signposted as oneway, & tagged the same > > And there are oneway hiking trails where it is a legal restriction. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
