Le 16.07.23 à 02:38, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit :
Comment is requested on a proposal to introduce two tags to indicate the
reason why a name=* tag has been omitted from a feature:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Omitted_name_tag
did we need to have this thread again and again ?
1) the fact that a name is disputed doesn't mean that it doesn't have a
name. if it doesn't have a name, then the name isn't disputed !
2) the fact that a name exist in several local language again isn't a
subdivision of "this doesn't have a name", default_langage may already
be used for that
about the rationale
1.1. yes it's possible to solve vandalism issue about the Persian Gulf /
Arabian Gulf naming dispute : just revert the vandalism.
adding a noname=for me it should not have a name=* but for another it
should have one" doesn't solve the issue, you only have 2 tags for a
waredit in stead of on
1.2. I see a used case if you see something rongly tagged with
noname=yes and delete it but aren't not sure yet how to spell the name=*
I also doesn't see why you call it trolltag
so in fact, you don't only want to add new tag to express why somebody
think that an object shouldn't have a tag, you also want that ppl
that think that are allowed to remove the name tag
that's a *bad* idea.
how did I render a name in that case ? how 'll it solve the Persian Gulf
/ Arabian Gulf naming dispute ? currently showing disputed name
is better than don't show anything because someone disagree with
the more common name(s)
Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
