A most excellent suggestion, hanser, and at first glance, a well-structured OSM 
thrust forward for this concept:  I am enthusiastic.  Please keep up this sort 
of good communication!

Just yesterday I left off of our Caltrain wiki [1] the so-called "6-trains" on 
its Schedule [2] in preparation for what will be called "Blended Service" 
(future California High Speed Rail shares "commuter rail" tracks upgraded to 
what in the USA are Class 6 track, 110 MPH / 176 km/hr) known as the "Northern 
Bookend" in the San Francisco Bay Area's big upgrades to rail over the next 
decade.

The reason I left off the "6-trains" from this train wiki table is because 
these aren't trains.  (During weekend construction of new electrification 
towers, substations, et cetera).  Here (California, USA), we don't call these 
"Ersatz" or "Replacement" service for the trains, we call these "bus bridges."

With this, OSM will have a way to describe these "acting like train routes but 
are really bus routes."  They do have their own "special purpose" signage, 
paint-on-pavement (sometimes looks like shoe-prints-in-paint) and other "route 
navigation aids."  I look forward to a well-designed proposal and/or the 
emergence of sensible tagging strategies after this sort of consultation with 
the greater community, so, Thanks for bringing this up!

[1] 
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/California/Railroads/Passenger#Caltrain_/_Peninsula_Corridor_Joint_Powers_Board_(JPBX)
[2] https://www.caltrain.com/routes/l6?active_tab=route_explorer_tab
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to