Voting is about formal acceptance of the de facto usage. I do not expect any no's, but maybe someone was against the tag al these years and now finally gets the chance to say no. A fail will not change anything to the de facto usage.
If a bunch of no votes appear, I will simply cancel my proposal. But I trust it'll pass. So far, no criticism on the mapping itself has been posted. (If I had tried the same with landcover=trees|grass.... don't worry, I won't) Peter Elderson Op vr 24 feb. 2023 om 11:51 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > Am Fr., 24. Feb. 2023 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson < > pelder...@gmail.com>: > >> Sorry, I wasn't clear. The current status of the tag is de facto (was: in >> use, but someone, not me, amended that). The proposal intends to alter >> that from de facto to approved, by voting. >> >> Fr gr Peter Elderson >> > > > are you going to change the definition with the vote? Let's imagine you > start a voting for the exact same text as is now on the tag definition > page. > If it wins it will change the tag status from "de-facto" to "approved". If > it fails, will it change the tag status from "de-facto" to what? Strictly, > voting is about a proposal, not about "tags" (it is about the > definition/meaning that should be associated to the tags). > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
