It makes sense to me if the feature is clearly intended to be a BBQ/grilling one, but the grill is missing. One such example that comes to mind is a state park with picnic tables and grill boxes where 1/3 of the latter are missing the grills.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, 08:14 Matija Nalis < mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote: > Recently, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:grate has been > documented > with some 232 uses, to map whether `leisure=firepit` and `amenity=bbq` > have a > grate (AKA cooking grate / grill / cooking grid). > > While it might be useful for `leisure=firepit`, I do not think it makes > sense > for `amenity=bbq` at all. > > BBQ grill is a place that has some way to contain a fire and a > grill/grate/grid > on which food is cooked. If it misses that grill, then it in my opinion can > hardly be classified as `amenity=bbq`, but is instead fire ring / fire pit > (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_ring) which is according to wiki > to be > tagged as `leisure=firepit` instead. > > Who do others think? does `amenity=bbq` + `grate=no` make any sense to > you, or > should it be documented as discouraged? > > -- > Opinions above are GNU-copylefted. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
