There are several people who approved the previous vote with the explanation that they don't like the ML and that some are actually discouraged to make a proposal.
"you say it again but i have never seen a proposal write that is blocked because the person did not post to the mailing list" Of course not because people would abandon the proposal if they read the requirements. 7 jan. 2023 18:55 van marc_marc_at_mailo_com_xrkimi...@simplelogin.co: > This email failed anti-phishing checks when it was received by SimpleLogin, > be careful with its content. > More info on https://simplelogin.io/docs/getting-started/anti-phishing/ > ------------------------------ > Le 07.01.23 à 18:39, Cartographer10 via Tagging a écrit : > For proposal authors, it means that they don't specifically have to interact > with the ML. > that is what I call a fragmentation, that's what happend > with the fragmentaiton of the fr community > >> There are people who feel discouraged to make a proposal because of the ML >> requirements >> > > you say it again but i have never seen a proposal write that is blocked > because the person did not post to the mailing list. if that was the case, > you propose to post to the mailing list. so this problem does not exist. it > would be really beneficial not to contradict you. > the only consequence of an acceptance of this proposal will be that some > proposals will be discussed *only* on the forum (because as you say some > don't want to discuss on the list AND because there is an impatience to > discuss the proposals there even if the forum is currently failing for a > correct use by email). > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
