One of the names might be the predominant name used locally.

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022, 2:19 PM Yves via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org>
wrote:

> Remove the name of the way, put a name on each relations. Except if it
> makes sense to keep the name also on the way for whatever reason you see
> fit.
>
> Le 30 décembre 2022 18:06:12 GMT+01:00, Dave F via Tagging <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit :
>>
>> What do you do if there are two routes?
>>
>> DaveF
>>
>> On 30/12/2022 02:19, brad wrote:
>>
>> +1
>> If the only name is the route name I think it makes good sense to put it
>> on the local way too, that's the name of the trail.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> On 12/29/22 08:59, Zeke Farwell wrote:
>>
>> I've heard the assertion that a way has no name but the route that passes
>> over it does many times.  While this is true in some cases, in others it is
>> not.  Where the primary purpose of the way is not for the route, this does
>> make sense.  For example mentioned by Jmapb where the Appalachian trail
>> follows an unnamed driveway or sidewalk.  In these cases, the primary
>> purpose is a driveway or sidewalk for local use, and the Appalachian Trail
>> just happens to follow it as well.  Here putting the name Appalachian Trail
>> on the way makes no sense.  However, there are also dedicated sections of
>> trail built first and foremost to be a part of the Appalachian Trail and
>> that have no other name.  Omitting the name Appalachian Trail in a case
>> like that makes no sense to me.  That section of trail is indeed called the
>> Appalachian Trail.  The whole route is also called the Appalachian Trail
>> and that's ok.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:38 AM Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/29/2022 10:13 AM, Zeke Farwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, the way name tag should be the most local trail name.  However,
>>> sometimes there is no local trail name and the long distance route name is
>>> the only name.  In this case putting the long distance route name on the
>>> ways also makes sense.
>>>
>>> I've been doing some mapping on the Appalachian Trail lately and this
>>> appears to be the common practice, although the AT is dominant enough that
>>> constituent trails sometimes lose their local names over time.
>>>
>>> Some mappers will take it a little too far and tag sections of sidewalk
>>> and driveway that the AT follows with name=Appalachian Trail (or even
>>> name=Appalachian National Scenic Trail... IMO this is an official_name, and
>>> probably only belongs on the route superrelation.)
>>>
>>> It's common to see ref=AT as well, which is fine on trails (even locally
>>> named ones) and perhaps ok on the sidewalks, but adding it to a vehicular
>>> road seems iffy.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing 
>> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing 
>> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to