On Nov 20, 2022, at 3:47 PM, François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> wrote: > utility=* key is already widely used and expect one single value, in every > situation.
While I regret not doing simple wiki research that would have revealed a collision with my “out loud imagining” clearly-stated to be just that (an IMAGINED tagging scheme for utility=*), I do stand by my post as an exercise in potential (not necessarily actual, again, clearly stated) key=value pairs. I also agree that semicolon-separated values can be problematic for some parsers / routers / renderers / use-cases, although they are indeed used in our map. Thanks to Warin for supporting that “further evolution” of the key space may continue to take place, as the specific key has already seen a fair bit of modification and growth since its inception. Apologies if there was any confusion: my intent was to encourage the imagining and potential development of a tagging scheme that might combine the semantics of “utility” and “office,” as it is a potentially very rich combination of syntax. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
