sent from a phone
> On 11 Oct 2022, at 12:06, Davidoskky <davidos...@yahoo.it> wrote: > > I do agree, and that is also my objective; but I do like the idea of having a > very generic value you can fall back to when no other value applies. I don’t like the idea, because it will only slow down development of significant tags. Either the fountain you want to tag fits into an existing category, or you invent a new one, or you simply don’t put this detail. Filling in a generic placeholder is not helpful. > > >> this alternative tagging is just a temporary hickup which will wash out >> automatically I guess, but we could try to speed it up. > Sure, but I see no reason for showing it on the wiki. reason is that people use it. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
