On 5/10/22 22:44, Illia Marchenko wrote:
Alternative to the sport=soccer is sport=british_football because "football" is context specific, and "American football", "Australian football", "Canadian football", "Gaelic football" exists.


In parts of Britain 'football' is rugby ...

For some people in Australia 'football' is soccer, others rugby, others AFL (OSM 'australian_football').



ср, 5 окт. 2022 г., 13:52 martianfreeloader <martianfreeloa...@posteo.net>:

    There is a broad consensus that the language for OSM tags is British
    English. Using a non-BE word for a tag because it is used in
    Australia
    while a synonymous BE word exists, would be the same using a Xhosa,
    Portuguese or Korean word, just because it exists.

    I know there are a few exceptions like sport=soccer, footway=sidewalk
    and sidewalk=*, but I think this kind of exceptions shouldn't be made
    without a very good reason.



    On 05/10/2022 12:04, Warin wrote:
    >
    > On 5/10/22 08:25, Minh Nguyen wrote:
    >> Vào lúc 11:54 2022-10-04, Jass Kurn đã viết:
    >>> I've just noticed there is a bubbler tag being promoted? Which
    >>> appears to be an American English term for a British English
    drinking
    >>> fountain. Why promote another term, and use an American
    English term.
    >>> What was wrong with calling a drinking fountain a drinking
    fountain?
    >>
    >> To clarify, "bubbler" is a distinctively regional term in Boston,
    >> Rhode Island, and Wisconsin. Elsewhere, it's either "drinking
    >> fountain" or "water fountain". [1]
    >
    >
    > No. 'Bubbler' is also used in Australia. And possibly elsewhere
    is the
    > world.
    >
    > -------------------------
    >
    > In England it looks like a "Drinker Water Fountain" spurts water
    > upwards. There are some with elevated outlets described as water
    bottle
    > filler, but are at a height that is convenient to drink from
    with flow
    > rates to suit direct human consumption.
    >
    >
    > Things that direct water downwards? And have flow rates greater
    than
    > convenient for human consumption? To me, these are 'taps'.
    >
    >
    > The problem?
    >
    >
    > 1) identify feature that provided drinkable water - fairly
    basic. At the
    > moment the common amenity=drinking_water does this .. or the
    secondary
    > tag of drinking_water=yes.


This fails to consider the supply of water that is not drinkable ... thus complicating the tagging.

So I have revised this in another message.


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to