Re: "That would be a camp site you can enter with a motorhome, but not with a trailer."
I don't think that exists in the real world. Motorhomes (aka RVs) are quite large and long, usually bigger than the combination of a small caravan (aka trailer) + motorcar. -- Joseph Eisenberg On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:50 AM Jan Michel <j...@mueschelsoft.de> wrote: > On 31.10.20 14:40, Sven Geggus wrote: > > > We are already using plural when tagging caravans=yes/no and > tents=yes/no. > > > > Thus I would not suggents to tag this singular in case of capacity. > > > > Looking at the current state of tagging in taginfo we have: > > > > capacity:caravans 65 > > capacity:caravan 4 > > capacity:tents 241 > > capacity:tent 0 > > > Thus I do not see a real argument for using singular here. > > To complete this list: > capacity:motorhome 32 > capacity:motorhomes 0 > > The thing about caravan and caravans is a mess. Both keys actually exist... > - 'caravan' refers to the vehicle in form of a trailer and whether it is > allowed to access some highway / area > - 'caravans' refers to either trailers or full motorhomes and only > applies to camp_sites. > > So, capacity:caravan should be used on parking lots that have spaces for > cars with trailers, while capacity:caravans should be used on camp_sites > that accomodate either caravan trailers or motorhomes, but there is no > distinction possible between both kinds of vehicles. > > As a result this is a fully valid tagging: > > amenity = camp_site > caravan = no > capacity:caravans = 10 > > That would be a camp site you can enter with a motorhome, but not with a > trailer. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
