Looks like a good idea. In that context: When travelling with a bike and a small tent (applies equally to hikers) I have encountered the following issues:
- camp sites that do not accept small tents - they only have places for caravans and large tents. - camp sites that do have areas dedicated to that type of travellers, but the limit is the space, there is areno max numbers of persons or tents If you cannot give any precise max numbers, it would be nice to have some kind of classification of size of a camp site but I have no idea how to express that aspect. If we are introducing a major change thes issues could also be addressed Volker On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 14:43, Sven Geggus <li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de> wrote: > Jan Michel <j...@mueschelsoft.de> wrote: > > > In fact, capacity:caravan and capacity:motorhome are used more often > > compared to caravans and motorhomes. > > > > I would go for > > > > - capacity:persons > > - capacity:tents > > - capacity:caravan > > - capacity:motorhome > > We are already using plural when tagging caravans=yes/no and tents=yes/no. > > Thus I would not suggents to tag this singular in case of capacity. > > Looking at the current state of tagging in taginfo we have: > > capacity:caravans 65 > capacity:caravan 4 > capacity:tents 241 > capacity:tent 0 > > Thus I do not see a real argument for using singular here. > > Sven > > -- > "Thinking of using NT for your critical apps? > Isn't there enough suffering in the > world?" > (Advertisement of Sun Microsystems in Wall Street > Journal) > /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
