Imagine I would add hgv=no or motorcycle=no tags to pedestrian crossingsIs there a case where hgv use sidewalk together with pedestrians and cross road using crossing shared with a pedestrians? Is there a case of sidewalk where hgv are allowed but on crossing with road oneis supposed to walk carrying your vehicle? Is there some existing usage of hgv=noon crossings?Valid questions, but the exact same questions apply for a pedestrian way crossing a secondary. On that pedestrian way cyclists are not allowed so what is the use of adding bicycle=no to the crossing node? I agree that adding bicycle=no on highway=crossing is pointless on footways with bicycle=no or where bicycle=no is implied It is useful solely if cyclists are allowed on cycleway/footway crossing road and are obligated to dismount if crossing road at that point
It would be good if all crossings that require this special handling can be found searching for bicycle=no + highway=crossing but that is not possible as the overwhelming majority are cases of pointless tagging. For these abnormal cases cyclist are never obliged to dismount at the point of the crossing but from one side of the road to the other side of the road so tagging that part of the way separately is more precise.
(and yes, in most cases, though not all, it can be retagged as access tagging on way)
Can you give an example?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
