Oct 7, 2020, 23:01 by [email protected]: > > The recent "meaning of highway=crossing + bicycle=no" thread makes the case > that it means "you cannot use this crossing to cross road while cycling, it > does not affect legality of cycling on the road" > > I think this is a bad idea as that way the access can not be evaluated in > node context (a router would have to look at the incoming and outgoing way) > I agree that splitting way and having short section as footway is also correct tagging and making data processing easier for router. Though harder for other data consumers, for example detecting of places where bicycle crossing should be created would be significantly harder. But many highway=crossing bicycle=no exists and OSM Wiki should document that also this tagging scheme is used and what is its meaning as used by mappers. What kind of tagging should be recommended/deprecated is a separate issue.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
