On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 14:55, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > indeed I would not suggest to use this on polygons, rather for linear > features like roads and waterways. I’m specifically interested in roads > with associated, purposefully planted tree roads (shade, scenic effect). > Around here there are roads several miles long lined with trees. I've rarely mapped them unless there was a compelling reason, but adding this attribute to the road doesn't really help. There will be hundreds of metres that are tree-lined, then anywhere from 10 to hundreds of metres of ordinary hedge, then more trees. It can be trees on both sides, or one side, or alternating. I hope you get the idea. I don't think I've seen any stretch of road which is continuously lined with trees along its entire length. To use this attribute I'd have to put many splits in the way. I wouldn't use this attribute on anything around here. I wouldn't recommend that anybody else use it. In fact, I'd recommend they don't. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
