On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 12:41, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I feel that tree_lined=separate should be used if trees are separately > mapped > What purpose does tree_lined=separate serve? Inspection of the map shows the object is tree-lined. I still do not see a purpose for the attribute except as a convenient way of avoiding mapping tree rows. But the tree rows themselves may not fully enclose the object whilst the tree_lined attribute implies they do. It is always better to map the tree rows, anyway. Is there a serious need (other than, say, one person's dissertation) to perform database queries to find objects that are tree-lined? I can see the need to find the nearest car park with disabled spaces, or vehicle charging points, but not for trees lining it. That's probably just me, but trees lining a car park do not influence my choice of whether or not to use it. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
