Is there further discussion on this, or do the advocates thing it’s ready for a vote?
> On Jun 26, 2020, at 11:19, Walker Bradley <walker.t.brad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I fully support it as outlined by Joseph. > >>> On Jun 26, 2020, at 12:59, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> > Regarding man_made=qanat versus canal=qanat, it is worth pointing out that >> > qanats surface and become surface canals for irrigation and distribution. >> > > Thus, it would be continuity to go from waterway=canal, canal=qanat, >> > tunnel=yes to waterway=canal instead. >> >> Yes, that is the plan. You can also add usage=irrigation or another >> appropriate value of usage=*, and width=* >> >> – Joseph Eisenberg >> >>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:12 AM Walker Bradley <walker.t.brad...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> I concur that historic or heritage should be secondary tags. >>> >>> Regarding man_made=qanat versus canal=qanat, it is worth pointing out that >>> qanats surface and become surface canals for irrigation and distribution. >>> Thus, it would be continuity to go from waterway=canal, canal=qanat, >>> tunnel=yes to waterway=canal instead. Thoughts? >>> >>>>> On Jun 26, 2020, at 11:27, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 15:57, Walker Bradley <walker.t.brad...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So it would seem that historic=* or heritage=* would be appropriate >>>>> sub-tags for qanats when applicable on top of waterway=canal, >>>>> canal=qanat, tunnel=yes. >>>> >>>> That's how I see it. Using historic=qanat for modern qanats seems wrong. >>>> So >>>> if we need different tagging for modern qanats anyway, then handle historic >>>> qanats by adding historic=yes. >>>>> >>>>> I guess we would need to discuss after the approval of Qanat for what >>>>> criterion/ia would determine historic=yes for qanat. >>>> >>>> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic and then discuss if it >>>> needs >>>> modifying/expanding to specifically deal with qanats or if the page for >>>> man_made=qanat needs text clarifying what Historic means for qanats. >>>> >>>> If a historian, even an amateur one, is eager to visit it then it's >>>> historic. >>>> If a historian takes a look and says "Meh" then it isn't historic. Which >>>> isn't a very objective metric, so some would say the historic tag >>>> shouldn't be used at all (another good reason to prefer man_made=qanat) >>>> over historic=qanat). >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
