Am Do., 30. Juli 2020 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Alan Mackie <aamac...@gmail.com>:
> This is why I suggested that the more practical solution would probably be > to re-tag all existing admin_level=2 with admin_level=1 except for the EU > ones as there are far fewer elements to be updated. Arbitrarily deciding > that the EU gets its own admin_level not used by other top level entities > breaks consistency with the rest of the world for the sake of local pride. > which other top level entities are you getting at? Why should we not tag these with the same tag? Actually, admin_level=1 is already quite established, just with a different key: heritage=1 (for UN heritage sites) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/heritage=1#map > > The EU is not the only entity that has arisen by agreement of neighbours > to clump together, in that respect it is only unique in that it is the most > populous one that happens to be doing so at this particular point in time. > you are of course free to add the past ones in OHM ;-) > Of course every entity is unique in its own special way, but the > uniqueness of individual trees and mountains doesn't stop us from > attempting consistent tagging. > +1 cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
