Hi, On 30.07.20 11:19, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > Unlike such objects EU has (AFAIK) well defined border, matching > existing administrative boundaries, so problems inherent in > mapping fuzzy objects are not present.
I'm not an expert on international treaties but I believe that if France bought Alaska from the US tomorrow, then Alaska would become part of the EU, without the EU having much of a say in it, isn't that so? This is of course a very hypothetical example but little swaps of un-inhabited land happen between neighbouring countries from time to time. The "EU boundary" is the sum of whatever national boundaries its member states have. Same with the "Schengen area" which is guarded by Frontex which you linked to; it's a construct that is the result of a contract but not an administrative area. > I am not opposing it and it seems defensible. Anything is, on this mailing list ;) Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging