I do consider a site relation a fitting approach for a city wall. On Sun, 12 Jul 2020, 22:35 Andy Townsend, <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/07/2020 20:13, Taskar Center wrote: > > > > Why is the relation type on the Berlin Wall a “collection” rather than > > “boundary”? > > Over its history as an object in OSM it's had a whole variety of tags. > Different people have said "This is important! We should render it!" > and have sometimes tried to do that by adjusting the tags until they > found something that rendered. Other people have tried to change tags > to better reflect the current reality. > http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=6651797 tells the story. > > Personally, I don't think that "boundary" would be a good relation type > for it because it isn't one - it's the route of a former barrier within > a boundary. Compare > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6651797#map=19/52.51616/13.37698 > with the suburb boundary just to the west. > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
