Jun 9, 2020, 14:42 by ja...@piorkowski.ca: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 07:56, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 04:08, Jarek Piórkowski <ja...@piorkowski.ca> wrote: >> >>> Yet we wouldn't map Watling Street in OSM with a way tagged as >>> roman_road=demolished nor roman_road=razed nor roman_road=abandoned >>> >> >> Nope. We'd map the portions that are existing ways like this: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7063236 >> > > Could we do similar with torn-up railways? > > Then the parts where rails or railbed are actually remaining could be > railway=abandoned or whatever, and parts with nothing remaining could > be plain ways in a relation like > https://osm.org/way/498608783 > No. I am OK with extreme broad interpretation of what counts as remain of railway allowing it to map. But mapping where nothing at all is remaining is clearly out of scope of OSM.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
