May 27, 2020, 01:35 by fernando.treb...@gmail.com:

> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 1:48 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> May 26, 2020, 18:04 by fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
>>
>> Bikes may "pass" in two different ways: riding
>> (bicycle=yes/permissive/destination) or pushing (bicycle=dismount).
>> Bikes are only completely forbidden if bicycle=no/private.
>>
>> bicycle=no does not mean that you cannot push bicycle
>>
>
> The wiki defines bicycle=no the same as access=no, which means no
> access. If you have foot=no, that means no access by foot.
>
and if you have bicycle=no that means no access by bicycle
It says nothing about access with bicycle (pushed/carried).

>> bicycle=no and bicycle=dismount are de facto equivalents
>>
>
> How can you conclude that?
>
Based on my experience of how people map such restrictions?
Based on my experience how tags in such situations are processed by data 
consumers?

And it is not just me, see 
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9158
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-October/thread.html#15135


>  bicycle=dismount was added to the wiki in
> 2010. Since then, the number of uses of bicycle=no has increased about
> six-fold. 
>
And? It says nothing about whatever people adding bicycle=no are
even aware about bicycle=dismount
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to