May 21, 2020, 04:34 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 20/5/20 10:49 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> Thanks for rescuing the useful content from that proposal. >> >> I reused images from older proposal, hopefully it is OK >> (but oif unwanted - feel free to revert) >> >> At least for me it is useful illustration of what the proposal is about >> and clearly demonstrate that it actually ahpepns >> (as such complicated routes are highly unusual in my region) >> > > Hummm... > > > The exclusion of the black trail as a possible 'excursion' in the main route > is a judgment call. I'd be very careful about it. > > Why is one excluded where the other is not? Is that is going to be difficult > to explain in a simple way? > Black trail in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Dead_end_hiking_route.png is a completely separate trail. If it would be signed as a part of green trail, then it ways would get "excursion" roie. But as it is a separate one its ways are having either blank or "main" role.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
