Am Mo., 6. Apr. 2020 um 14:00 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny < kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>:
> That would also allow us to address Joseph Eisenberg's objection (in > the talk page on the WIki) that the proposal violates the 'one object, > one tag' principle. there is no such principle (AFAIK a principle like this is tried to adhere to in OSM-Carto, where they try that one tag is supported for displaying "one kind of thing" (and to which there is at least the exception of highway=footway and highway=path with foot=designated, etc.). But this isn't a general OSM principle (where we also generally try to avoid different tags with the same meaning, but accept their creation if there are reasons). The principle in OSM tagging is "One feature, one OSM element", and it will always work out if you apply the "correct interpretation", because the real world doesn't have "features", they come into existence with us defining what a feature is. E.g. a School delimited by a fence could be seen as 2 features: a school and a fence, or it could be seen as one feature, a fenced off school. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
