Does the current version look any better? Obviously, once we're seriously stitching things into the Wiki, we'll need to make individual pages with titles like 'Key:protection_class=recreation', but of course it's easier to have it all in one place for now.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 7:24 PM Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The only thing that the proposal page still needs is a couple more > detailed definitions for some of the tags. > > The ones based on IUCN levels already have a fairly good description. > > But protection_class=recreation should be clarified - what exactly is > protected here, and what sort of recreation are we talking about? It > should be clear how this is different than a leisure=recreation_ground > or sports_centre or =park. > > The tags protection_class=water, protection_class=culture, and > protection_class=hazard might need slightly improved definitions too. > > Besides that, everything looks pretty good. > > -- Joseph Eisenberg > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
