Surely this can be fixed if needed, but Osm2pgsql still has a route_name column? A strange and evil case of rendering for the mapper. Yves
Le 2 avril 2020 23:00:53 GMT+02:00, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> a écrit : >Peter Elderson wrote: >> Suggestion for rendering: >> What about osmc:name=* >> I know, doesn't exist, but it's a logical companion of osmc:symbol. >> Definition would be: name to show on the map. >> Definition should be: just the simple name as found in the field, or >> the nae ecerybody knows and uses, no extra's. > >That's pretty good _except_ for the tag name, I think. The osmc: prefix >comes from a particular (fairly obscure) bit of software called OSM >Composer, and for historical reasons it's become the popular tag for >symbols, but there's no reason to perpetuate that into other tags. I'd >be >100% on board with using route_name= with your suggested definition. > >Richard > > > >-- >Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html > >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
