I don't see a clear distinction between student accommodations and other residential areas.
In California there are many "mini-dorms" and private student housing buildings which are not located on the University campus or operated by the university. Would theybe tagged amenity=student_accommodation? What about a Sorority or Fraternity? I think it's sufficient to map a building for a single student dormitory, or use a named landuse=residential area for a larger, named "residential college" or "housing unit" which contains several buildings but has one commonly-used name. Note that landuse=residential is commonly used with a name=* tag to map named apartment complexes which have several buildings, in California, Singapore and Indonesia at least. Here we also have many "perumahan" features, which translate as something like "housing development" or "housing estate" and contain 10 to a few dozen houses with a fence and gate around it, and a big sign in front like "Perumahan Anggrek Biru" ("Blue Orchid Residences"). These are mapped as landuse=residential + name=* We can use residential=university for student housing, residential=apartments and residential=single_family if these details need to be mapped. Some may object: "but if I create a landuse=residential area inside of an amenity=university, it will look funny on Map rendering X and Y" - but we don't map for the renderer, we try to represent reality as best we can. Land that is used for student dorms or apartments is not objectively different than any other residential area, except for the age of the residents, whether or not it is operated by a University -- Joseph Eisenberg On 2/29/20, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Feb 28, 2020, 18:49 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > >> >> >> Am Fr., 28. Feb. 2020 um 18:43 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging >> <> tagging@openstreetmap.org> >: >> >>> name and operator may be tagged >>> also on landuse >>> >> >> >> IMHO it doesn't make a lot of sense >> > Why? For named residential areas it is a perfect match, > >> and it isn't typically done (have a look at landuse=residential, and get >> rid of those that additionally have a "place" tag, almost none of them has >> a name, >> > 301 779 cases worldwide http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Rae > > around 5% of all > landuse=residential https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=residential > > >> Generally we should not use landuse for features, for settlement parts >> there is "place" >> > Landuse is one of features (I guess that difference here is something > related to definition > of "feature"). > > And for well defined settlement parts named residential is perfect. > For example > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131446564#map=17/50.06500/19.90505 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131446564#map=17/50.06500/19.90505&layers=N> > > > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging