Feb 28, 2020, 18:49 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > Am Fr., 28. Feb. 2020 um 18:43 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> >: > >> name and operator may be tagged >> also on landuse >> > > > IMHO it doesn't make a lot of sense > Why? For named residential areas it is a perfect match, > and it isn't typically done (have a look at landuse=residential, and get rid > of those that additionally have a "place" tag, almost none of them has a name, > 301 779 cases worldwide http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Rae around 5% of all landuse=residential https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=residential > Generally we should not use landuse for features, for settlement parts there > is "place" > Landuse is one of features (I guess that difference here is something related to definition of "feature"). And for well defined settlement parts named residential is perfect. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131446564#map=17/50.06500/19.90505 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131446564#map=17/50.06500/19.90505&layers=N>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
