sent from a phone
> Il giorno 5 feb 2020, alle ore 11:53, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > I have not looked into this in detail, but this seems to me a strong case for > site relations. I don’t see how site relations would solve the different levels of structure in different countries/universities. Site relations could solve the problem of connecting things added as nodes only, on the other hand this would slow down more detailed mapping as areas (which are generally preferable for everything with some size IMHO, even if approximate). When a faculty is distributed over several locations, it could be represented as multipolygons, or even just with a faculty tag in combination with other tags (like name of the university it is part of). I’m not dismissing the idea of site relations for this in general, but there isn’t a strong case in favor of them either (semantically, I would see a faculty at 2 locations as 2 “sites”). Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
