TING Best, -- Peter Elderson
Op wo 15 jan. 2020 om 22:54 schreef Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 21:17, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > > I would not consider disused=yes to be >> deprecated for physical objects like >> building, adits, quarries etc. >> > > The wiki for the disused prefix has been amended since the last time this > came > up, and a long way down the page, after several mentions that disused=yes > should > not be used, it concedes that disused=yes could be used on those objects. > I would > suggest that explanation should be expanded to include all physical > objects and those > exceptions given the first time disused=yes is mentioned. > > OSM Carto will handle such objects, >> without checking whatever tag disused=yes is set. >> > > English usage of modal verbs has subtle differences from other Germanic > languages, > particularly with respect to "will." OSM carto does currently ignore > disused=yes. > Are you telling me that it is guaranteed, by the core developers, that it > always > will ignore disused=yes (or, at most, render slightly differently)? If > OSM carto > core developers can give that guarantee then we can amend the wiki > accordingly, > describing when it is appropriate to use disused;key=value and when to add > disused=yes and what the effects of those two approaches will be on > standard > carto. > > If we have that guarantee, and document it, there's a chance other cartos > will > adopt the same approach. Otherwise all we can do is document that it works > that way on standard carto today, but there is no guarantee that it will > work > in the future. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
