12 Jan 2020, 00:28 by ja...@piorkowski.ca: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 11:57, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 17:17 Uhr schrieb Jarek Piórkowski >> <ja...@piorkowski.ca>: >> >>> I imagine that virtually all real-world pedestrian ways that are >>> one-way for pedestrians would be on dedicated pedestrian ways - that >>> is, highway=footway. If that's correct, oneway=yes can be interpreted >>> as referring to pedestrians on footways (it looks like osm-carto >>> already does this?). I struggle to imagine a one-way pedestrian way >>> that is also open to bicycle riders (dismount still works in this >>> scheme). >>> >> >> there are many highway=footway with bicycle=yes tags in Germany and other >> countries, where this is used to model a "cyclists can use it" (with major >> precaution) on footways: >> http://www.gruene-badvilbel.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Verkehrszeichen-Fu%C3%9Fweg_Fahrrad-frei.jpg >> > > Are there many that are one-way for cyclists or for pedestrians but not both? > Footways with oneway bicycle traffic allowed. Usually tagged as highway=footway + bicycle=yes + oneway=yes
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
